U

Undisclosed

Anonymous client cuts e-discovery review time 93% with predictive coding

Curated & reviewed by Peter Korpak, Founder & Chief Analyst, 100SignalsHow we verify
93% reduction (1,500 → 100 hours)Review Hours Saved
90%Document Review Population Reduction
92% at 80% recallModel Precision

Vendor-reported figures — source: elevate.law

Undisclosed
Metric Before After Impact
Review Hours 1,500 100 93% reduction
Document Review Population 100% 10% 90% reduction
Model Precision 92% High-precision classification at 80% recall

The Challenge

During a high-stakes discovery matter, the client faced contentious proceedings where opposing counsel challenged the document identification approach. The sudden addition of 80,000 documents requiring review, combined with reliance on a single in-house senior subject matter expert, made accelerating a prolonged manual review of large volumes of similar content effectively impossible.

The Solution

Elevate deployed Everlaw predictive coding technology to analyse 80,000 unreviewed documents using a 5,000-document pre-reviewed seed set. The model flagged unique content for training enrichment and identified 4,471 documents as highly relevant. A subject matter expert confirmed accuracy, and objective Precision and Recall metrics were used to determine a defensible review completion point, achieving 92% precision in detecting 80% of relevant documents.

Results

The predictive coding approach reduced the document review population by 90% and cut estimated review hours from 1,500 to 100 — a 93% reduction — dramatically accelerating the discovery timeline. Integrated quality control processes also reduced errors stemming from inconsistent human coding practices.

Key Takeaways

  • A small seed set (5,000 documents) is sufficient to train a model that reliably triages 80,000+ documents, enabling defensible TAR workflows.
  • Objective performance metrics (Precision and Recall) provide the evidentiary basis needed to withstand opposing counsel challenges.
  • SME involvement for accuracy confirmation remains essential even when AI handles bulk classification.

Share:

Details

Company
Undisclosed
Quality
Curated
Last verified
Jul 28, 2026

Have a similar implementation?

Share your customer's AI results and link it to your vendor profile.

Submit a case study →