GSK Stockmann cuts structured diligence review time 15–20% with AI workflows

GSK Stockmann deployed Large Language Models & Generative AI for Due Diligence in Law Firms. As reported by www.harvey.ai: 15–20% initial savings structured diligence review time.

Maintained by Peter Korpak, Lead EditorHow evidence is checked
15–20% initial savingsStructured Diligence Review Time
up to 75% time savingsUnstructured Data Room Review Time
Hours instead of daysRed-Flag Summary Generation

Source-reported figures — cited source: www.harvey.ai

What GSK Stockmann was trying to fix

Due diligence is one of the most resource-intensive parts of transactional work at GSK Stockmann, with teams routinely reviewing hundreds of contracts and supporting documents under tight deadlines. More than 60% of the firm's lawyers have frequent touch points with diligence procedures. Manual review consumed significant lawyer time and constrained capacity for higher-value strategic advisory work.

What GSK Stockmann deployed

GSK Stockmann partnered with Harvey and hosted a week-long offsite in August 2025 to co-design generative AI workflows spanning the full corporate and real estate due diligence process—from scope determination through report delivery. The solution combined conditional workflows to spot missing or misfiled documents, human-in-the-loop risk validation with Harvey's citation engine, web search against statutory/regulatory and public sources, and workflow playbooks with contextual system prompts (company size, jurisdictions, debt facilities).

Results

Structured M&A, PE, VC, and real estate diligence saw initial time savings of 15–20%, with higher savings on unstructured data rooms. Red-flag summaries that previously took days were generated in hours, and AI-driven spotting of misfiled documents reduced unnecessary back-and-forth with targets. Junior and mid-level lawyers accelerated risk prioritization skills, freeing senior associates for more strategic work and enabling broader analysis beyond the data room.

Key Takeaways

    • Codifying firm standards with structured prompting and a prompt-creation tool ahead of immersion workshops was pivotal to successful AI process redesign.
    • Match tool complexity to the task: simple shared queries for one-offs; Vault analysis tables and custom workflows with conditionality and human-in-the-loop steps for complex diligence.
    • Immersive, interdisciplinary collaboration (lawyers, legal engineers, developers, and the vendor) shifts teams from ad-hoc experimentation to structured, everyday AI adoption.

Evidence for GSK Stockmann's Due Diligence deployment

Reported outcome metrics
3 cited below
Cited source
www.harvey.ai
Last updated
Source link checked

Share:

Details

Industry
Law Firms
Company Size
MidMarket

Have a similar implementation?

Share your customer's AI results and link it to your vendor profile.

Submit a case study →