Boutique Firm Dunning Vallejo & MacDonald Cuts Arbitration Research Time 50-70% with Jus AI

Dunning Vallejo & MacDonald LLP deployed Large Language Models & Generative AI for Legal Research & Case Law in Law Firms. As reported by dailyjus.com: 50-70% reduction legal research time.

Maintained by Peter Korpak, Lead EditorHow evidence is checked
50-70% reductionLegal Research Time
~20-30 hours cut to ~2h15m48-Hour Deadline Research Task
5-10 hours reduced to 2-3 hoursCross-Examination Prep Time

Source-reported figures — cited source: dailyjus.com

Dunning Vallejo & MacDonald LLP
Metric Before After Impact
Legal Research Time — 50-70% reduction 50-70% faster across most matters
48-Hour Deadline Research Task 20-30 hours 2 hours 15 minutes 91% reduction
Cross-Examination Prep Time 5-10 hours 2-3 hours 65% reduction

What Dunning Vallejo & MacDonald LLP was trying to fix

Dunning Vallejo & MacDonald (DV&M) is a young, nimble New York boutique firm handling international arbitration and complex business disputes, but with limited staff it had to devote scarce attorney hours to legal research. International arbitration compounds the problem: decisions, pleadings, and briefs are frequently confidential, and no generic legal research product was built specifically for this niche, making it slow to locate useful precedent.

What Dunning Vallejo & MacDonald LLP deployed

DV&M adopted Jus AI, Jus Mundi's arbitration-specialized legal research assistant, chosen for its purpose-built international arbitration database (including hard-to-find confidential decisions and pleadings), ease of use for a lean team, and responsive vendor support.

Results

The firm reports 50-70% faster legal research across most matters. Facing a 48-hour tribunal deadline that would previously have required 20-30 hours of research, the team produced the needed analysis in about 2 hours and 15 minutes after prompt tweaking. Overnight cross-examination prep using daily witness transcripts dropped from 5-10 hours to 2-3 hours, and early case assessment/client intake accelerated, letting the firm compete head-to-head with larger firms.

Key Takeaways

  • Domain-specialized AI research tools (with niche, otherwise-inaccessible data) can outperform generic legal research products for specific practice areas like international arbitration.
  • AI-driven research speed lets small, resource-constrained firms take on tight deadlines and compete against larger, better-staffed teams.
  • Responsive vendor support and ease of adoption matter as much as raw capability for lean teams evaluating new tools.

Evidence for Dunning Vallejo & MacDonald LLP's Legal Research & Case Law deployment

Reported outcome metrics
3 cited below
Cited source
dailyjus.com
Last updated
Source published
Source link checked

Share:

Have a similar implementation?

Share your customer's AI results and link it to your vendor profile.

Submit a case study →