Eversheds Sutherland faced a structural tension common to large law firms: M&A diligence workloads are dominated by high-volume document review that consumes significant associate hours while clients increasingly expect faster deal execution and more flexible pricing. AI had been introduced only through isolated pilot programs — useful for proof-of-concept but insufficient to change delivery economics at scale. The billable-hour model created internal resistance to efficiency gains, and the firm risked losing competitive ground as clients began treating AI-enabled diligence speed and pricing transparency as baseline expectations rather than differentiators.
Eversheds Sutherland formally transitioned AI from pilot programs into firmwide infrastructure embedded across core M&A diligence workflows. Using large language models and generative AI capabilities, the firm deployed risk prioritization, document triage, and value-focused diligence analytics at practice scale rather than in isolated matters. The shift was deliberate: rather than layering AI tools on top of existing workflows, the firm restructured diligence delivery around AI-assisted outputs — moving the unit of work from document volume reviewed to deal risk and value identified. This required investment in governance, process design, and attorney adoption across the M&A practice, not just tool procurement.
Diligence workflows now operate at firmwide scale, enabling Eversheds Sutherland to compete directly against AI-native entrants like Stella Legal and platform-led approaches like Emma Legal's $1B+ deal volume. Key outcomes include:
Have a similar implementation?
Share your customer's AI results and link it to your vendor profile.
Submit a case study →