Vendor-reported figures — source: dailyjus.com
Before Jus AI, thorough arbitration research at Templars was slow and resource-intensive. Accessing full arbitration jurisprudence, databases, and publications was difficult, and materials such as recently issued tribunal awards often required reaching out to contacts in England, France, and the United States. Work that should support active hearings could consume two to three full working days searching hard-copy materials and library resources—time that was not spent on analysis, argumentation, and strategy.
Templars adopted Jus AI as a specialist international arbitration research platform, citing the lack of comparable depth in general legal databases. The tool provides access to exclusive arbitral awards, jurisprudence, and publications, including material from a network of over 110 institutional partnerships. The firm used Jus AI for day-to-day research, live hearing response, and matter-specific work such as bifurcation pleadings and ICC security-for-costs submissions via the ICC Dispute Resolution Library.
Research that previously took two to three days now takes 15 to 30 minutes, with lawyers able to generate a basic outline and review materials quickly. In a live hearing, the team conducted real-time research on an unanticipated opposing point and produced a well-reasoned response on the spot. Jus AI analysis was incorporated directly into pleadings and submissions, and partners report that faster, higher-quality delivery strengthens client retention and practice growth by shifting time from locating materials to deeper analysis and strategy.
Have a similar implementation?
Share your customer's AI results and link it to your vendor profile.
Submit a case study →
AI Roadmap — Associates spending the week on doc review. Contracts taking two weeks to turn. Both have AI fixes. We'll show you which, in what order. 72 hours.